Serviços Personalizados
Artigo
Links relacionados
Compartilhar
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
versão On-line ISSN 1677-3225
Braz. J. Oral Sci. vol.9 no.2 Piracicaba Abr./Jun. 2010
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Evaluation of cytotoxicity of accessories used for traction of impacted teeth
Rogério Lacerda dos SantosI; Matheus Melo PithonI; Fernanda Otaviano MartinsII; Maria Teresa Villela RomanosIII; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira RuellasIV
IDDS, MS, PhD Student in Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
IIBS, Student in Microbiology, Department of Microbiology, Orthodontics Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
IIIBS, Assistant Professor of Microbiology, Department of Microbiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
IVDDS, MS, PhD, Assistant Professor of Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
ABSTRACT
AIM: To test the hypothesis that gold-coated orthodontic accessories used for canine traction are less cytotoxic than those made of stainless steel.
METHODS: Six different orthodontic accessories were evaluated, three of them made from stainless steel (1 bracket, 2 button, 3 mesh pad) and three made from a gold-coated alloy (4 small mesh pad, 5 button, 6 big mesh pad). Three control groups were also analyzed: Positive control (C+), consisting of Tween 80 cell detergent; Negative control (C-), consisting of PBS; and Cell control (CC), consisting of cells not exposed to any material. Dye-uptake technique, in which neutral red dye is incorporated into viable cells, was used to assess the cytotoxicity of the accessories. Viable cell counting was performed using a spectrophotometer. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukeys test.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (P< 0.05) were found between Groups 1-3 and Groups 4-6. However, no differences were found between Groups 1-3 and Groups C- and CC, and neither between Groups 4-6 and Group C+.
CONCLUSIONS: The tested hypothesis was not confirmed since gold-coated orthodontic accessories were found to be more cytotoxic than those made of stainless steel.
Keywords: tooth, impacted, orthodontic appliance, orthodontic appliance design.
Full text available only in PDF format.
References
1. Ozan F, Kara I, Ay S. Impacted mandibular permanent incisors associated with a supernumerary tooth: a case report. Eur J Dent. 2009; 3: 324-8. [ Links ]
2. Al-Nimri K, Adwan I, Gharaibeh T, Hazzaa AM. Tooth size discrepancies in female patients with palatally impacted canines. Aust Orthod J. 2008; 24: 129-33. [ Links ]
3. Golubeva GI, Rabukhina NA, Perfilev SA, Stadnitskaia NP, Ospanova GB, Volchek D. [Procedure for spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of tooth impaction]. Vestn Rentgenol Radiol. 2005 (2): 4-8. [ Links ]
4. Baccetti T, Crescini A, Nieri M, Rotundo R, Pini Prato GP. Orthodontic treatment of impacted maxillary canines: an appraisal of prognostic factors. Prog Orthod. 2007; 8: 6-15. [ Links ]
5. Ertan Erdinc AM. Orthodontic and surgical approach to the treatment of bilaterally impacted maxillary canines: a case report. Quintessence Int. 2008; 39: 587-92. [ Links ]
6. Wilson B. Palatally impacted maxillary canines. Int J Orthod. 2008; 19: 9-16. [ Links ]
7. Abron A, Mendro RL, Kaplan S. Impacted permanent maxillary canines: diagnosis and treatment. N Y State Dent J. 2004; 70: 24-8. [ Links ]
8. Barlow ST, Moore MB, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ, Sandy JR. Palatally impacted canines and the modified index of orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod. 2009; 31: 362-6. [ Links ]
9. Crescini A, Baccetti T, Rotundo R, Mancini EA, Prato GP. Tunnel technique for the treatment of impacted mandibular canines. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009; 29: 213-8. [ Links ]
10. Puricelli E. Apicotomy: a root apical fracture for surgical treatment of impacted upper canines. Head Face Med. 2007; 3: 33. [ Links ]
11. Schubert M, Baumert U. Alignment of impacted maxillary canines: critical analysis of eruption path and treatment time. J Orofac Orthop. 2009; 70: 200-12. [ Links ]
12. Becker A, Shpack N, Shteyer A. Attachment bonding to impacted teeth at the time of surgical exposure. Eur J Orthod. 1996; 18: 457-63. [ Links ]
13. Hsu SH, Tang CM, Tseng HJ. Biostability and biocompatibility of poly(ester urethane)-gold nanocomposites. Acta Biomater. 2008; 4: 1797-1808. [ Links ]
14. Neyndorff HC, Bartel DL, Tufaro F, Levy JG. Development of a model to demonstrate photosensitizer-mediated viral inactivation in blood. Transfusion 1990; 30: 485-90. [ Links ]
15. Santos RL, Pithon MM, Oliveira MV, Mendes GS, Romanos MTV, Ruellas ACO. Cytotoxicity of introral orthodontic elastics. Braz J Oral Sci 2008; 7: 1520-5. [ Links ]
16. Santos RL, Pithon MM, Mendes GS, Romanos MTV, Ruellas ACO. Cytotoxicity of intermaxillary orthodontic elastics of different colors: an in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17: 326-9. [ Links ]
17. Craig RG, Hanks CT. Cytotoxicity of experimental casting alloys evaluated by cell culture tests. J Dent Res. 1990; 69: 1539-42. [ Links ]
18. Grill V, Sandrucci MA, Basa M, Di Lenarda R, Dorigo E, Narducci P et al. The influence of dental metal alloys on cell proliferation and fibronectin arrangement in human fibroblast cultures. Arch Oral Biol. 1997; 42: 641-7. [ Links ]
19. Griffon G, Marchal C, Merlin JL, Marchal S, Parache RM, Bey P. Radiosensitivity of multicellular tumour spheroids obtained from human ovarian cancers. Eur J Cancer. 1995; 31A: 85-91. [ Links ]
20. Pithon MM, Santos RL, Ruellas ACO, Fidalgo TK, Romanos MTV, Mendes GS. In vitro cytotoxicity of orthodontic elastics: comparison between two methodologies. Rev.Saúde.Com 2008; 4: 19-26. [ Links ]
21. Rege BD, Kao JP, Polli JE. Effects of nonionic surfactants on membrane transporters in Caco-2 cell monolayers. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2002; 16: 237-46. [ Links ]
22. Stutzenberger FJ. Interference of the detergent Tween 80 in protein assays. Anal Biochem. 1992; 207: 249-54. [ Links ]
23. Domingues FC, Queiroz JA, Cabral JM, Fonseca LP. The influence of culture conditions on mycelial structure and cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2000; 26: 394-401. [ Links ]
24. Freitas MPM, Oshima HS, Menezes LM, Machado DC, Viezzere C. Cytotoxicity of Silver Solder Employed in Orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79: 939-44. [ Links ]
25. Serrano MC, Pagani R, Vallet-Regi M, Pena J, Ramila A, Izquierdo I et al. In vitro biocompatibility assessment of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) films using L929 mouse fibroblasts. Biomaterials. 2004; 25: 5603-11. [ Links ]
26. Syrjanen S, Hensten-Pettersen A, Kangasniemi K, Yli-Urpo A. In vitro and in vivo biological responses to some dental alloys tested separately and in combinations. Biomaterials. 1985; 6: 169-76. [ Links ]
27. Ramalho MG, Lopes EA, Silva CR. Biological effects induced by salts of tin contained in toothpastes and mouthwashes. FESBE 1998; 1: 413-4. [ Links ]
28. Schettini DA, Costa Val AP, Souza LF, Demicheli C, Rocha OG, Melo MN et al. Distribution of liposome-encapsulated antimony in dogs. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003; 36: 269-72. [ Links ]
29. Wang Q, Liu B, Yang H, Wang X, Lin Z. Toxicity of lead, cadmium and mercury on embryogenesis, survival, growth and metamorphosis of Meretrix meretrix larvae. Ecotoxicology. 2009; 18: 829-37. [ Links ]
30. Li M, Xia T, Jiang CS, Li LJ, Fu JL, Zhou ZC. Cadmium directly induced the opening of membrane permeability pore of mitochondria which possibly involved in cadmium-triggered apoptosis. Toxicology. 2003; 194: 19-33. [ Links ]
31. Celik A, Comelekoglu U, Yalin S. A study on the investigation of cadmium chloride genotoxicity in rat bone marrow using micronucleus test and chromosome aberration analysis. Toxicol Ind Health. 2005; 21: 243-8. [ Links ]
Correspondence to:
Rogério Lacerda dos Santos
Rua Ipatinga, 170, Planalto
Divinópolis- MG- Brasil - CEP: 35501-191
E-mail: lacerdaorto@hotmail.com
Received for publication: December 16, 2009
Accepted: June 21, 2010