SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9 número3 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences

versão On-line ISSN 1677-3225

Braz. J. Oral Sci. vol.9 no.3 Piracicaba Jul./Set. 2010

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

Cytotoxicity of orthodontic elastics: In vitro investigation with on L929 mouse fibroblasts

 

 

Rogério Lacerda dos SantosI; Matheus Melo PithonI; Fernanda Otaviano MartinsII; Maria Teresa Villela RomanosIII

ISpecialist in Orthodontics, Federal University of Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Master in Orthodontics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. PhD student in Orthodontics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
IIGraduated in Biological Sciences: Microbiology and Immunology Federal University of Rio de Janeiro-UFRJ
IIIAssistant Professor of Microbiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Correspondence to

 

 


ABSTRACT

AIM: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the cytotoxicity among natural latex elastics of different manufacturers using a L929 cell line culture.
METHODS:
Different latex intraoral elastics (I.D. = 5/16", 4.5 oz.) were tested. The sample was divided into 7 groups of 15 elastics each: Group AO (American Orthodontics), Group GAC (GAC International), Group TP (TP Orthodontics), Group AD (Aditek), Group AB (Abzil), Group MO (Morelli) and Group UN (Uniden). Cytotoxicity assays were performed by using cell culture medium containing L-929 line cells (mouse fibroblast). The cytotoxicity was evaluated by using the "dye-uptake" test, which was employed at two different moments (1 and 24 h). Data were compared by ANOVA and Tukey's test (P < 0.05).
RESULTS:
The results showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) between all groups and the group CC (cell control) at 1 and 24 h. Groups AD, AB, MO and UN were noticeably more cytotoxic than the groups AO, GAC and TP at 1 h. After 24 h, a significant decrease in cell viability was observed in all groups.
CONCLUSIONS:
Intraoral elastics from American Orthodontics, GAC and TP Orthodontics trademarks induced less cell lysis than Aditek, Abzil, Morelli and Uniden trademarks.

Keywords: cytotoxicity, elastics, biocompatibility, orthodontics.


 

 

Full text available only in PDF format.

 

 

References

1. Kao CT, Ding SJ, He H, Chou MY, Huang TH. Cytotoxicity of orthodontic wire corroded in fluoride solution in vitro. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77: 349-54.         [ Links ]

2. Vande Vannet BM, Hanssens JL. Cytotoxicity of two bonding adhesives assessed by three-dimensional cell culture. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77: 716-22.         [ Links ]

3. Weiss ME, Hirshman CA. Latex allergy. Can J Anaesth. 1992; 39: 528-32.         [ Links ]

4. Perrella FW, Gaspari AA. Natural rubber latex protein reduction with an emphasis on enzyme treatment. Methods. 2002; 27: 77-86.         [ Links ]

5. Lobner D, Asrari M. Neurotoxicity of dental amalgam is mediated by zinc. J Dent Res. 2003; 82: 243-6.         [ Links ]

6. Hanson M, Lobner D. In vitro neuronal cytotoxicity of latex and nonlatex orthodontic elastics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126: 65-70.         [ Links ]

7. Schmalz G. Use of cell cultures for toxicity testing of dental materials—advantages and limitations. J Dent. 1994; 22 Suppl 2: S6-11.         [ Links ]

8. Holmes J, Barker MK, Walley EK, Tuncay OC. Cytotoxicity of orthodontic elastics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 104: 188-91.         [ Links ]

9. Palosuo T, Alenius H, Turjanmaa K. Quantitation of latex allergens. Methods. 2002; 27: 52-8.         [ Links ]

10. Wakelin SH, White IR. Natural rubber latex allergy. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1999; 24: 245-8.         [ Links ]

11. Everett FG, Hice TL. Contact stomatitis resulting from the use of orthodontic rubber elastics: report of case. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974; 88: 1030-1.         [ Links ]

12. Tomazic VJ, Withrow TJ, Fisher BR, Dillard SF. Latex-associated allergies and anaphylactic reactions. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1992; 64: 89-97.         [ Links ]

13. Turjanmaa K, Alenius H, Makinen-Kiljunen S, Reunala T, Palosuo T. Natural rubber latex allergy. Allergy. 1996; 51: 593-602.         [ Links ]

14. Santos RL, Pithon MM, Mendes GS, Romanos MTV, Ruellas ACO. Cytotoxicity of intermaxillary orthodontic elastics of different colors: An in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 4: 326-9.         [ Links ]

15. Santos RL, Pithon MM, Oliveira MV, Mendes GS, Romanos MTV, Ruellas ACO. Cytotoxicity of intraoral orthodontic elastics. . Braz J Oral Sci. 2008; 24: 1520-5.         [ Links ]

16. dos santos RL, Pithon MM, Martins FO, Romanos MT, de Oliveira Ruellas AC. Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of latex and non-latex orthodontic separating elastics. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2010; 13: 28-33.         [ Links ]

17. Neyndorff HC, Bartel DL, Tufaro F, Levy JG. Development of a model to demonstrate photosensitizer-mediated viral inactivation in blood. Transfusion. 1990; 30: 485-90.         [ Links ]

18. Tomakidi P, Koke U, Kern R, Erdinger L, Kruger H, Kohl A et al. Assessment of acute cyto- and genotoxicity of corrosion eluates obtained from orthodontic materials using monolayer cultures of immortalized human gingival keratinocytes. J Orofac Orthop. 2000; 61: 2-19.         [ Links ]

19. Rose EC, Jonas IE, Kappert HF. In vitro investigation into the biological assessment of orthodontic wires. J Orofac Orthop. 1998; 59: 253-64.         [ Links ]

20. Schedle A, Samorapoompichit P, Rausch-Fan XH, Franz A, Fureder W, Sperr WR et al. Response of L-929 fibroblasts, human gingival fibroblasts, and human tissue mast cells to various metal cations. J Dent Res. 1995; 74: 1513-20.         [ Links ]

21. Franz A, Konig F, Skolka A, Sperr W, Bauer P, Lucas T et al. Cytotoxicity of resin composites as a function of interface area. Dent Mater. 2007; 23: 1438-46.         [ Links ]

22. Hwang CJ, Cha JY. Mechanical and biological comparison of latex and silicone rubber bands. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124: 379-86.         [ Links ]

23. Snyder HA, Settle S. The rise in latex allergy: implications for the dentist. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994; 125: 1089-97.         [ Links ]

24. Neiburger EJ. A case of possible latex allergy. J Clin Orthod. 1991; 25: 559-60.         [ Links ]

25. Sussman GL, Beezhold DH, Liss G. Latex allergy: historical perspective. Methods. 2002; 27: 3-9.         [ Links ]

26. Chauvel-Lebret DJ, Pellen-Mussi P. Evaluation of the in vitro biocompatibility of various elastomers. Biomaterials. 1991; 20: 291-9.         [ Links ]

27. Carey AB, Cornish K, Schrank P, Ward B, Simon R. Cross-reactivity of alternate plant sources of latex in subjects with systemic IgE-mediated sensitivity to Hevea brasiliensis latex. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1995; 74: 317-20.         [ Links ]

28. Towse A, O'Brien M, Twarog FJ, Braimon J, Moses AC. Local reaction secondary to insulin injection. A potential role for latex antigens in insulin vials and syringes. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18: 1195-7.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence to:
Rogério Lacerda dos Santos
Rua Ipatinga, 170, Planalto
Divinópolis- MG- Brazil CEP 35501-191
E-mail: lacerdaorto@hotmail.com; lacerdaorto@bol.com.br

Received for publication: April 08, 2010
Accepted: August 23, 2010