ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

Short implants with single-unit restorations in posterior regions with reduced height – a retrospective study

 

 

Jamal Hassan Assaf^I; Agenor Montebello Filho^II; Fabricio Batistin Zanatta^III

^IDDS, MS, São Leopoldo Mandic Research Center, Dental School, Campinas, SP, Brazil
^IIPhD, Professor, São Leopoldo Mandic Research Center Dental School, Campinas, SP, Brazil
^IIIDDS, MS, Professor, Franciscan University Center , Santa Maria, RS, Brazil

Correspondence to

 

 

---

ABSTRACT

AIM: Previous studies have shown excellent prognosis with short implants. However, evidence of short implants rehabilitated with single-unit restorations is scarce. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the percentage of success of short implants in posterior maxillary and mandibular regions with single-unit restorations.
METHODS: This study comprised a retrospective analysis of data of 41 patients that received 54 short implants between 2004 and 2009. All implants were placed by the same surgeon and all restorations were performed by experienced professionals. All implants were placed in sites with reduced bone volume; 48 implants were evaluated by computed tomography and 6 implants by radiography. Failures and biological complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: It was observed a success rate of 96.3% in the osseointegration period and 100% in the load period that ranging from 7 to 38 months. Two complications were observed, which were successfully treated without risk of implant loss.
CONCLUSIONS: Short implants in posterior regions rehabilitated with single-unit restorations are a treatment option with high success rate and thus may be indicated in posterior regions with reduced bone height.

Keywords: short implants, single-unit restorations, success, retrospective study.

---

 

 

Full text available only in PDF format.

 

 

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the radiography center of DIX (Caridade Hospital, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil) for the support related to tomography exams. Dr. Assaf, Montebello Filho and Dr. Zanatta report no conflicts of interest related to this study.

 

References

1. Misch CE, Steigenga J, Barboza E, Misch-Dietsh F, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. J Periodontol. 2006; 77: 1340-7.         [ Links ]

2. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2006; 17(suppl 2) : 35-51.         [ Links ]

3. Weng D, Jacobson Z, Tarnow D, Hürzeler MB, Faehn O, Sanavi F et al. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surfaced implants: results after 6 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003; 18: 417-23.         [ Links ]

4. Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol. 2000; 5: 22-31.         [ Links ]

5. Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20: 220-30.         [ Links ]

6. Van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Folmer T, Henry P, Herrmann I et al. The Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990 ; 5: 272-81.         [ Links ]

7. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995 ; 10: 303-11.         [ Links ]

8. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failure in 4641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: a study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991; 6: 142-6.         [ Links ]

9. Bahat O. Treatment planning and placement of dental implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993; 8: 151-61.         [ Links ]

10. Arlin M. Short dental implants as a treatment option: Results from an observational study in a single private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21: 769-76.         [ Links ]

11. Testori T, Wiseman L, Woolfe S, Porter SS. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four-year interim report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16: 193-200.         [ Links ]

12. Mordenfeld MH, Johansson A, Hedin M ,Billström C, Fyrberg KA. A retrospective clinical study of wide-diameter implants used in posterior edentulous areas. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 387-92.         [ Links ]

13. Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985.         [ Links ]

14. Buser D, Weber HP, Brägger U. The treatment of partially edentulous patients with ITI hollow-screw implants: presurgical evaluation and surgical procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5: 165-75.         [ Links ]

15. Summers RB.A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique.Compendium.1994 ; 15: 152-8.         [ Links ]

16. Summers RB. The osteotome technique: Part 2—The ridge expansion osteotomy (REO) procedure. Compendium. 1994 ; 15: 422-6 .         [ Links ]

17. Summers RB. The osteotome technique: Part 3—Less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium. 1994 ; 15: 698-700.         [ Links ]

18. Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2001; 12: 423-32.         [ Links ]

19. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998; 106: 527-51.         [ Links ]

20. Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000. 1998; 17: 63-76.         [ Links ]

21. Deporter DA, Todescan R , Caudry S. Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porous-surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation. Int J Periodontics and Restorative Dent. 2000; 20: 477-85.         [ Links ]

22. Renouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005: 7(suppl. 1): 104–10.         [ Links ]

23. Ten Bruggenkate CM, Asikainen P, Foitzik C, Krekeler G, Sutter F. Short (6 mm) nonsubmerged dental implants: results of amulticenter clinical trial of 1 to 7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13: 791-8.         [ Links ]

24. Romeo E, Chiapasco M, Ghisolfi M, Vogel G. Long-term clinical effectiveness of oral implants in the treatment of partial edentulism. Sevenyear life table analysis of a prospective study with ITI Dental Implants System used for single-tooth restorations. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2002 ; 13: 133-43.         [ Links ]

25. Deporter D, Pilliar RM, Todescan R, Watson P, Pharoah M. Managing the posterior mandible of partially edentulous patients with short, porous-surfaced dental implants: early data from a clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16: 653-8.         [ Links ]

26. Griffin TJ, Cheung WS. The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92: 139-44.         [ Links ]

27. Fugazzotto PA, Beagle JR, Ganeles J, Jaffin R, Vlassis J, Kumar A. Success and failure rates of 9 mm or shorter implants in the replacement of missing maxillary molars when restored with individual crowns: preliminary results 0 to 84 months in function. A retrospective study. J Periodontol. 2004; 75: 327-32.         [ Links ]

28. Goene' R, Bianchesi C, Hurzeler M, Del Lupo R, Testori T, Davarpanah M et al. Performance of short implants in partial restorations: 3-year followup of Osseotite implants. Implant Dent. 2005; 14: 274-80.         [ Links ]

29. Levine RA, Ganeles J, Jaffin RA, Clem DS 3rd, Beagle JR, Keller GW. Multicenter retrospective analysis of wide-neck dental implants for single molar replacement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22: 736 -42.         [ Links ]

30. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: A systematic review. Clin. Oral Impl Res. 2009; 20(suppl 4): 172-84.         [ Links ]

31. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003; 8: 328-43.         [ Links ]

32. Feldman S, Boitel N, Weng D, Kohles SS, Stach RM. Five-year survival distributions of short-length (10mm or less) machined - surfaced and Osseotite implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004; 6: 16-23.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence to:
Jamal Hassan Assaf
Rua Pinheiro Machado, 2380/310
CEP: 97050-600 - Santa Maria - RS - Brazil
Phone: +55 55 32221088
Fax: +55 55 30270927
E-mail: jamal.assaf@hotmail.com

Received for publication: July 15, 2010
Accepted: December 07, 2010