SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.62 número2 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

RGO.Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)

versão On-line ISSN 1981-8637

RGO, Rev. gaúch. odontol. (Online) vol.62 no.2 Porto Alegre Abr. 2014

 

ORIGINAL / ORIGINAL

 

Perception assessment of periodontal patients regarding their self-care

 

Avaliação da percepção dos pacientes periodontais em relação à importância do autocuidado

 

 

Athus GARCIAI; Érika Manuela Asteria CLAVIJOI; Flávia Martão FLÓRIOI; Luciana Satie OKAJIMAI; Almenara de Souza FONSECA-SILVAI


I Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Curso de Odontologia. Rua José Rocha Junqueira, 13, Swift, 13045-755, Campinas, SP, Brasil

Correspondence:

 

 


ABSTRACT

Objective
The aim of this study is to evaluate, through a questionnaire, patients' awareness and behavior regarding periodontal disease, as well as their perceptions of the importance of self-care in order to control the disease.

Methods
50 male and female patients, age ranging between 31 to 67 years old, presenting moderate to advanced periodontal disease were submitted to a 26 question-survey which aimed to assess the following: the patient's profile, his knowledge and awareness of the periodontal disease ,the dental practioner's commitment as to inform the patient about the importance of the concepts and understandings of his own self-care related to the disease. After data tabulation, they were subjected to exploratory analysis by means of tables and graphics of distribution of frequencies.

Results
The data showed that most patients were unanimously aware of the presence of periodontal disease and it also demonstrated that if they follow the dentist's recommendations, there will be a better disease prognosis. About 94 to 96% of the participants in the sample showed a higher level of knowledge about the etiology, treatment and consequences of periodontal disease, and reported that such information came from dental professionals.

Conclusion
It was concluded that the periodontal disease patient becomes motivated to promote his self-care when the dentist promotes a proper instruction.

Indexing terms: Periodontal disease. Prevention & Control. Self care.


RESUMO

Objetivo
Avaliar o conhecimento dos pacientes em relação à doença periodontal e o empenho do profissional em educar, assim como seu comportamento e percepção com relação à importância do autocuidado para controle da doença.

Métodos
A amostra foi composta por 50 pacientes portadores de doença periodontal, que estavam em tratamento nos cursos de pós-graduação em Periodontia da Faculdade de Odontologia São Leopoldo Mandic, pertencentes a ambos os gêneros e com idade variando de 31 a 67 anos. O instrumento da pesquisa foi um questionário composto por perguntas de múltiplas escolhas. Após digitação e tabulação dos dados em planilha eletrônica Excel, estes foram submetidos à análise exploratória, sendo analisados por meio de tabelas e gráficos de distribuição de freqüências.

Resultados
Os dados, com base nas declarações obtidas, demonstraram que a maioria dos pacientes em tratamento apresentou grande receptividade e dedicação quanto aos autocuidados para controle da doença periodontal. Verificou-se uma consciência unânime de que se seguirem as recomendações do cirurgião-dentista, haverá um melhor prognóstico para a enfermidade. Cerca de 94 a 96% dos participantes da amostra apresentaram bom nível de conhecimento quanto à etiologia, controle e conseqüências da doença periodontal, afirmando terem recebido tais informações dos profissionais.

Conclusão
Conclui-se que o paciente se torna motivado quanto aos autocuidados para controle da doença periodontal, quando o cirurgião-dentista promove uma adequada educação e motivação.

Termos de indexação: Doenças periodontais. Autocuidado. Prevenção & Controle.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Periodontal diseases can be a challenge to dental practioners and public health since they encompass the major cause of tooth loss in adults, causing a crucial impact both on patients' oral functions and appearance1.

Tooth loss, resulting from the disease, directly affects masticatory ability, causing feed impairing, aesthetics and speech damage as well as psychological alterations. Repercussions such as these, contribute to the reduction in the daily life quality when understood as a sign of social inequality2.

Historically, Brazil has shown a faulty scenario concerning preventive and curative adult dental treatment, therefore triggering a raise in the number of edentulous patients. This could have certainly been avoided if proper treatment had been early instituted the high prevalence of periodontal disease in the Brazilian population is, indeed, one of the causes for this scenario.

The last epidemiological survey based on the Community Periodontal Index (CPI), according to macroregions and age groups in the country, show that 53.8% of people aged 15-19 years old have periodontal problems. However, with increasing age, the levels become higher reaching 78.1% and 92.1% in the age groups 35- 44 and 65-74 years old, respectively3.

Gingivitis and periodontitis comprise the two major inflammatory diseases which affect the periodonto4, both being the result of an interactive process between dental plaque and periodontal tissues through cellular and vascular responses. The onset and progression of periodontal disease involve a number of immunopathological and inflammatory features, including local, systemic, environmental and genetic modifying factors5.

In the treatment of periodontal disease, like most chronic diseases, a strict control is required and considered of great importance for the improvement of oral health. This control aims to eliminate the etiologic factors, keeping the oral cavity free of bacteria by means of patient's plaque control and recurring dental prophylaxis programs, as well as promoting host defense through good physical and mental health4,6.

According to the World Health Organization recommendations7, all actions and practices devoted to health promotion should approach not only the disease but the patient as well, considering him an inseparable biopsycho- social being within society.

Thus, self-care and self- management are defined by the World Health Organization in its model of Care for Chronic Conditions as a behavior in which the individual acts autonomously in order to establish and maintain his health while preventing and dealing with the disease.

The patient, then, becomes knowledgeable about his own disease which helps him realize the importance of caring and actively manage his own health. Self-care produces greater compliance with therapeutic schemes, therefore reducing the risk of future complications and disability associated with chronic problems providing the patient with better life quality.

In periodontics, it is also acknowledged that the patient himself is usually more capable of controlling his health-related changes and lifestyle than the dental profissional6. To do so, he must be motivated. Motivation acts as a driving force in the prevention working as an inducing factor. Clinically, it means getting the patient's cooperation in order to lead him in the desired direction, i.e. a change in his behavior.

In this case, the communication between patient /dental practitioner is of crucial importance for a successful treatment. Dental professionals should induce the patient's attitudes toward obtaining periodontal health. Adding to that, the patient must understand that proper oral hygiene measures such as, diet care, alcohol and cigarettes moderation together with stress management can prevent disease progression. Moreover, a patient/dental professional shared responsibility for the treatment must be assumed by the patient while establishing his self-care routine6,8-9.

The perception of periodontal patients and their responsibility in controlling the disease has not been reported in our literature. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess, through a questionnaire, the patients' knowledge about the subject as well as the dental professionals' commitment to instruct their patients towards their behavior and perceptions concerning the importance of self-care in order to control periodontal disease.

 

METHODS

The target population for this study consisted of 50 patients who were under periodontical treatment in the dental clinics of the Periodontics graduate courses at São Leopoldo Mandic School, Campinas Campus, São Paulo. The research was initiated only after approval by the São Leopoldo Mandic Faculty Committee for Research Ethics under Protocol. 0241, with the patients' signature and free consent.

The sample consisted of male and female patients, age ranging between 30 and 70 years old and randomly selected from the waiting rooms of the institution. Patients who were starting treatment were excluded.

A questionnaire consisting of multiple choice questions was used as assessement tool and its content evaluated the patients' profile, their knowledge about periodontal disease and the dental professional's commitment to instruct the patients towards their behavior concerning oral hygiene along with their perception of the importance of self-care for disease control. Data was tabulated and submitted to exploratory analysis and analyzed through tables and graphs of frequency distribution.

 

RESULTS

The data from 50 questionnaires used a sample of 42% males and 58% female volunteers, mean age of 49.2 years old, ranging between 31 and 67 years. As far as socio-economic level is considered, most participants in the sample (58%) reported a monthly income of up to 3 minimum wages, while 26% were found to be in the range between 4 and 7 minimum wages and 8% 8-11 minimum wages.

Patient's behavior concerning oral hygiene was assessed through the questionnaire responses. Table 1 presents statements about frequency, duration and quality of brushing, as well as information about the kind of products used, as well as how daily oral hygiene instructions were integrated in their daily routines. Table 2 is concerned with the patient's knowledge about the periodontal disease and the dental professional's committment in promoting the necessary instructions.

Table 3 verifies the patient's perception as to the importance of self-care in order to control periodontal disease and the following variables were recorded: 1) Have you been following the dentist's the instructions? 2) Are you aware that if you follow the instructions correctly the dentist can contribute a lot to prevent the development of periodontal disease? The answers to these questions can be seen in Table 3.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISCUSSION

Preventing and controlling periodontal diseases are effective measures in order to avoid its development and ensure health maintenance not only of the teeth supporting tissues, but also the mouth and the individual as a whole, since periodontal diseases are associated with systemic conditions such as the difficulty of diabetes metabolic control, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases10-12.

The periodontal disease control through patient's active participation is a crucial feature for a successful treatment. Therefore, professionals expect them to promote a daily biofilm controlling routine by means of a suitable oral hygiene13.

The most effective method among prevention measures, is the one which considers the patients' active self- care so as to manage their own health and promote habit changes7. For this reason a questionnaire was applied to evaluate the responsiveness of the patient's self-care education and oral hygiene behavior.

As for toothbrushing frequency, it was found that 84% of the volunteers reported brushing at least 3 times a day. In relation to brushing time, the results were also positive, showing that 28% of the sample reporting that they performed brushing within a time ranging between 3 and 6 minutes, while 56% performed the procedure longer than six minutes. This demonstrates that these patients have satisfactory standards. Confirming this statement, 60% said they had enough time for a good brushing, and of these, 26% said they had all the necessary time to improve their brushing.

According to Seyerskov14, more important than frequency is the hygiene quality. The data for self-assessment on the quality of hygiene was reported as excellent (20%) or very good (40%). Nobody reported a bad hygiene. On the whole it can be said that, for this sample of under treatment patients, they are striving to perform the biofilm control. Rylander and Lindhe15 emphasize that to generate appropriate oral hygiene habits, the patient's willingness and ability to clean his teeth properly is more important than the selection of a specific brushing method.

Regarding hygiene products, 70% of the volunteers reported using the brush recommended by the dentist. As for the use of dental floss, all 50 volunteers (100%) reported an affirmative response, whereas 54% of individuals make use of inter-proximal brush; 66% use end-tufted toothbrush and 40% use some antiseptic mouthwash solution.

The results showed that 82% of individuals had developed the proper brushing technique as a habit in their daily routine. This demonstrates that the majority of under treatment patients presenting periodontal disease, strive to acquire suitable products for daily biofilm control, despite their low socio-economic level (58% of volunteers reported a monthly income of up to 3 minimum wages).

Such patient's good treatment responsiveness and dedication reflect dental professionals' instructions which are motivation-oriented. Petry & Pretto16 described that to motivate and promote behavioral changes in patients, it is necessary to follow a sequence of informative steps leading the patient to treatment commitment.

Essential information such as: biofilm accumulation on the tooth surface as the cause of periodontal disease; combining biofilm control with proper oral hygiene and tooth loss as a result of untreated periodontal disease, were considered of pristine importance for a under treatment patient. In the questionnaire, 94 to 96% of the patients reported that were informed about these items by the dental professionals, while 2 to 4 % reported having learned about these through communication means.

The present study also showed that patients were aware about periodontal disease due to the high quality of information received. The data is as follows: 64% said the dental professional had explained everything and 34% reported having received enough information.

As to understanding the instructions received, 84% reported having understood all the dental professional's explanation, 12% only understood it partially and 4% could not aprehend the given information. According to Petry & Pretto16, to facilitate learning it is necessary to use a clear, simple language appropriate to the age and cultural level of the patient.

Although the results were satisfactory, patients' better understanding of the instructions could improve if more visuals and flyers as well as illustrations were used to help. Bandler & Grinder17 reported the importance of visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and olfactory and taste stimuli as essential aids for a patient's better understanding. Direct communication associated with the use of models, poster, leaflets and movies shows an efficient practice for motivating patients to oral hygiene and periodontal disease control18. However only 40% of volunteers reported receiving such aid for explanation. As perception of selfcare is concerned, a positive result was observed, since in the sample of 50 volunteers, 82% reported following the dental professionals' recommendations and even state to be aware that if they follow the instructions given they can collaborate to avoid progression of the periodontal disease. This seems to be the sum of many features as the knowledge of the disease etiology and pathology, treatment and control methods, as well as the motivational instructions by the dental professional. It can be clearly stated that the great majority of the patients was properly instructed for a healthy life.

 

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded, within the limitations of the present study, that the patient becomes motivated to promote his self-care and therefore control periodontal disease when proper motivation and instructions are enhanced by the dentist.

Collaborators

A GARCIA, EMA CLAVIJO, FM FLÓRIO, LS OKAJIMA and AS FONSECA-SILVA participated in all the stages of writing the article.

 

REFERENCES

1. American Academy of Periodontology. Guidelines for the management of patients with periodontal diseases. J Periodontol. 2006;77(9):1607-11. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.069001.         [ Links ]

2. Barbato PR, Nagano HCM, Zanchet FN, Boing AF, Peres MA. Perdas dentárias e fatores sociais, demográficos e de serviços associados em adultos brasileiros: uma análise dos dados do Estudo Epidemiológico Nacional (Projeto SB Brasil 2002-2003). Cad Saúde Pública. 2007;23(8):1803-14. doi: 10.1590/S0102- 311X2007000800007.

3. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Projeto SB Brasil 2003: condições de saúde bucal da População Brasileira 2002 -2003. Resultados principais. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2005 [citado 2010 Ago 8]. Disponível em: < http://dtr2001.saude.gov.br/editora/ produtos/livros/pdf/05_0053_M.pdf>.

4. American Academy of Periodontology. Treatment of plaqueinduced gingivitis, chronic periodontitis, and other clinical conditions. J Periodontol 2001;72(12):1790-800. doi:10.1902/ jop.2001.72.12.1790.

5. Sallum AW, Martins AG, Sallum EA. A doença periodontal e o surgimento de um novo paradigma. In: Brunetti MC. Periodontia médica: uma abordagem integrada. São Paulo: SENAC; 2004. p.21-39.

6. Genco JR, Goldman MH, Cohen DW. Periodontia contemporânea. São Paulo: Santos; 1996.

7. World Health Organization. Innovative care for chronic conditions: building blocks for action: global report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002 [cited 2010 Ago 8]. Available from: <http://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/ icccreport/en/>.

8. Couto JL, Duarte CA. Comunicação e motivação em periodontia: bases para o tratamento odontológico. São Paulo: Editora Santos; 2006.

9. American Academy of Periodontology. Tobacco use and the periodontal patient. J Periodontol. 1999;70:1419-27.

10. Oppermann RV, Rosing CK. Prevenção e tratamento das doenças periodontais. In: Kriger L. ABOPREV: promoção de saúde bucal - paradigma, ciência e humanização. 3ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Artes Médicas; 2003. p.260-75.

11. Rose LF, Genco RJ, Mealey BL, Cohen DW. Medicina periodontal. São Paulo: Editora Santos; 2002.

12. Cury PR, Joly JC, Araújo VC, Wassall T, Araújo NS. Periodontite: fator de risco para doenças sistêmicas? RGO - Rev Gaúcha Odontol. 2003;51(4):210-4.

13. Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang, PN. Tratado de periodontia clínica e implantologia oral. 4ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2005.

14. Seyerskov ATO. Cariologia clínica. 2ª ed. São Paulo: Editora Santos; 1995.

15. Rylander H, Lindhe J. Terapia periodontal associada à causa. In: Lindhe J. Tratado de periodontia clínica e implantologia oral. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 1999. p. 314-31.

16. Petry PC, Pretto SM. Educação e motivação em saúde bucal. In: Kriger L. ABOPREV: promoção de saúde bucal - paradigma, ciência e humanização. 3ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Artes Médicas; 2003. p. 371-86.

17. Bandler R, Grinder J. Sapos em príncipes. São Paulo: Editorial Summos; 1982. 18. Couto JL, Couto RS, Duarte CA. A importância da comunicação na motivação de pacientes. RGO - Rev Gaúcha Odontol. 2003;51(5):401-6.

 

 

 

Correspondence to:
AS FONSECA-SILVA
e-mail: asfsilva@terra.com.br

 

Received on: 13/7/2013
Final version resubmitted on: 4/2/2014
Approved on: 9/3/2014